Credit/iStock
As Congress revisits tax policies, the familiar refrain of banks attacking the tax-exempt status of credit unions has resurfaced. Banks claim that credit unions enjoy an unfair advantage, but these critiques conveniently ignore banks’ own exploitation of tax benefits. Behind their rhetoric, many banks actively utilize provisions of the Internal Revenue Code to sidestep paying their fair share of federal income taxes. This hypocrisy not only undermines their argument but also underscores the critical role credit unions play in fostering community development. Let’s break down the facts.
Banks’ Tax Strategies: Subchapter S and Depreciation
One of the primary ways banks sidestep federal taxes is through Subchapter S of the Internal Revenue Code. This provision allows qualifying banks to function as pass-through entities, avoiding federal corporate income taxes by distributing income directly to shareholders, who then pay individual taxes. Over 2,000 U.S. banks elect this status, collectively saving billions in federal taxes annually (Source: Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, 2023). In 2022 alone, Subchapter S banks saved an estimated $1.8 billion in federal income taxes (Source: American Bankers Association, 2022).
Recommended For You
In addition, banks take advantage of depreciation rules to lower taxable income. By writing off the costs of physical assets and certain intangibles, banks can defer or significantly reduce their tax obligations (Source: IRS Publication 946). These strategies are entirely legal but highlight the banks’ reliance on tax benefits that rival, if not surpass, those of credit unions.
While these banks save billions, they criticize credit unions as unfair competitors due to their tax-exempt status. This double standard highlights the inconsistency in the banks’ argument. Subchapter S banks are saving significant tax dollars while using their resources largely to maximize shareholder returns, rather than focusing on community impact.
Credit unions, due to their structure as not-for-profit financial cooperatives, are limited in their access to these depreciation-based tax deferrals. Credit unions’ primary objective is to return value to their members through lower fees, higher savings rates, and community investment rather than accumulating profits. Because credit unions generally do not engage in the same profit-oriented capital accumulation as banks, they do not benefit from the tax advantages that banks achieve through depreciation (Source: the NCUA).
This structural difference underscores the importance of preserving the tax-exempt status of credit unions, as they do not enjoy the same avenues for reducing tax liabilities that are available to for-profit institutions like banks (Source: Government Accountability Office, GAO-14-91).
Credit Unions’ Tax Exemption Supports Community Investment
Credit unions, unlike banks, are member-owned cooperatives that operate as not-for-profit organizations. Their tax-exempt status isn’t a loophole – it reflects their mission to serve communities, not shareholders. Rather than funneling earnings to investors, credit unions reinvest surplus income into member benefits such as better loan rates, reduced fees and community-focused programs.
In 2022, U.S. credit unions invested over $20 billion in initiatives like affordable housing, small business lending and financial literacy programs (Source: The NCUA, 2023). These investments are particularly impactful in underserved areas, where traditional banks often overlook or withdraw services. These investments are made possible by credit unions’ tax-exempt status, which aligns with their mission to support financial stability and economic development at a local level.
The Contrast: Banks’ Focus on Profits vs. Credit Unions’ Community Impact
While banks, especially those benefiting from Subchapter S status, highlight their charitable efforts, these pale in comparison to their broader goal of maximizing shareholder returns. A report by the Consumer Federation of America revealed that banks allocate only 1% of their profits to community reinvestment, directing the other 99% toward shareholder dividends and executive compensation.
Credit unions, by contrast, reinvest a significantly larger proportion of their earnings directly into their members’ financial well-being and local economies. This difference reflects the fundamental divergence in priorities: Banks prioritize profit, while credit unions prioritize community.
The Double Standard
Criticizing credit unions’ tax-exempt status while profiting from mechanisms like Subchapter S and depreciation is a glaring double standard. If fairness is the goal, it’s important to evaluate how both industries use their tax advantages. The real question isn’t whether credit unions should be tax-exempt, but whether banks’ utilization of Subchapter S and deprecation aligns with their criticisms. For true progress, let’s acknowledge that credit unions are fulfilling their mission of serving communities – a mission that banks claim to support but rarely practice when profits are at stake.
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
