Credit/Shutterstock
On May 16, the Supreme Court ruled that the Court of Appeals Second Circuit used the wrong legal analysis in determining that federal banks were not subject to a New York law mandating that banks and credit unions provide minimum interest payments on mortgage escrow accounts. The Court did the legal equivalent of giving the lower court back its homework assignment by instructing it to look more closely at the preemption provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act.
Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to CUTimes.com, part of your ALM digital membership.
Your access to unlimited CUTimes.com content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking credit union news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Weekly Shared Accounts podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical coverage of the commercial real estate and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, GlobeSt.com and ThinkAdvisor.com
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
