A California woman is suing Los Angeles Federal Credit Union for allegedly disclosing its overdraft fees improperly and assessing those fees even when members had enough money in their accounts.

The class action suit, filed Sept. 16 by plaintiff Mary Gray in a U.S. District Court in California, alleges that because the credit union didn't put the actual dollar amount of its overdraft fees on member opt-in forms, the forms don't constitute proper consent and the fees assessed should therefore go back to members.

In 2010, the Federal Reserve Board began allowing financial institutions to charge overdraft fees on ATM and one-time debit charges only if members consented via opt-in notices. Those notices must include, among other information, the dollar amount of overdraft fees, according to the complaint.

LAFCU's opt-in agreement is very similar to a sample opt-in agreement the Federal Reserve provided, though there is one major difference, the complaint said: “Instead of listing the overdraft fee in the document as required, [it] referenced some other document for information about the amount of the fee.”

The credit union's overdraft agreement, which was included in the complaint, read, “For current fees, visit our website or ask us.”

That's against the rules, which means LAFCU didn't get proper consent from members, the complaint alleged.

“The regulations are so clear as to what has to be in that opt-in form,” Gray's attorney, Richard McCune, told CU Times. “I don't have an explanation for why they decided to change the model form, but they clearly did. We have lots of other concerns about what banks and credit unions are doing, but this is the first time we've come across this.”

In regard to the overdraft agreement, Wolters Kluwer Financial Services Senior Attorney Kurt Stertz stated, “The standard generally is that the disclosure has to be substantially similar to the model form. So the question is, if you provide some of the content – specifically in this case, the fee – on a separate form, are you substantially similar to the model?”

The suit also alleged LAFCU incorrectly used available balances rather than actual balances to determine whether to assess overdraft fees.

“LAFCU's practice when assessing an overdraft fee on a transaction is to ignore whether there is enough money to pay the transactions, and instead makes the automated decision on assessing overdraft fees based on an artificial internal balance (available balance) rather than the actual balance,” it alleged. “While the available balance may be used for determining whether to authorize the transaction, it is directly contrary to the language in the contract and other materials to use it for purposes of assessing overdraft fees. The result is that LAFCU improperly charges members overdraft fees even when there is money in the account to pay the items.”

According to the complaint, the potential class includes anybody who has incurred overdraft fees for ATM and nonrecurring debit card transactions on an LAFCU account since the middle of September 2011 to now. McCune said he doesn't know the potential class size yet.

The suit is the latest in the mounting pressure on credit unions and financial institutions regarding overdraft fees. The CFPB has put overdraft services front and center on its 2015 rulemaking agenda.

“I think institutions should be paying real close attention to their programs and making sure that they are following all the rules with respect to disclosing their programs and designing their programs,” Stertz warned.

LAFCU, which has $834 million in assets and 54,000 members, has eight branches in the Los Angeles area. The credit union has not responded to a request for comment.

Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to CUTimes.com, part of your ALM digital membership.

Your access to unlimited CUTimes.com content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:

  • Breaking credit union news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
  • Weekly Shared Accounts podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
  • Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
  • Critical coverage of the commercial real estate and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, GlobeSt.com and ThinkAdvisor.com
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.