Few instances of regulatory guidance have created the same stir among credit unions as the NCUA's proposed risk-based capital rule.
But even fewer financial analyses have been as confusing as the one comparing NCUA's explanation of what it considers the true costs of the rule to both CUNA's and NAFCU's accusations of the economic burden credit unions will bear if the proposal passes.
The discussions to date have quite literally been a case of comparing NCUA's relatively small and conservative apples to the trade groups' really big eggplant, and it's clear that there's little hope of harvesting an equal comparison.
Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to CUTimes.com, part of your ALM digital membership.
Your access to unlimited CUTimes.com content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking credit union news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Weekly Shared Accounts podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical coverage of the commercial real estate and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, GlobeSt.com and ThinkAdvisor.com
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
