But Monahan's data show that – inexplicably – for certain activities mobile bankers are in fact more likely to come into a branch than are all other consumers.

The report stated: "Mobile bankers are statistically more likely than all consumers to go to the branch for three activities, which could potentially generate profit or cut costs: To learn about products and services (13% vs. 10% for all consumers); to buy a money order (9% vs. 7.5% for all consumers); to address potential fraud (8% vs.6% for all consumers)."

The report went on: "For example, at the average bank, 57% of mobile bankers made a deposit or withdrawal at the branch in the past 30 days. By switching just one in-person deposit to mobile per month, the average institution saves approximately $28.38 per annum per mobile banking customer, adding up to $1.5 billion in cost savings for the industry. Cost savings further multiply if FIs fully convert online bankers to mobile deposit."

With small steps aimed at modifying consumer behavior, said Monahan, most financial institutions could fairly swiftly generate significant cost savings without compromising the consumer's experience.

The report went on: "Fewer mobile bankers are calling to speak to a customer service rep to perform any banking function, dropping from 49% to 40% during the past two years. The next-generation banking model requires advanced services and products to be rolled out to the mobile channel."

That, said Monahan, is an issue for many financial institutions in that they have created systems that may inadvertently encourage the consumer to call a customer service rep, at significantly higher cost to the institution.

She pointed to the inability in many mobile banking and person to person payments tools to add new payees and how this frustrates consumers and also increases costs to the financial institution.

She added: "Financial institutions that learn to leverage the power of the technology are likely to experience significant growth."