A bill to revamp the examination process and allow appeals to an administrative law judge would raise NCUSIF premiums, give examiners less flexibility and raise administrative costs, NCUA Executive Director David Marquis told lawmakers on Wednesday.
Related News:
In testimony Wednesday before a House subcommittee Marquis said the bill's provision that creates additional appeals processes would add more regulatory layers that would increase costs without any assurance of greater effectiveness.
“Again, this change would cause examiners to fully document each and every finding, and examination costs would increase,'' he said.
In addition, Marquis said, the measure could be “disruptive to our existing internal consultation process and possibly stimulate greater appeals of examination filings, both increasing the risk to the NCUSIF and costs to the industry.''
The measure would also mandate that the NCUA and other agencies cannot put a commercial loan in nonaccrual status just because the collateral has decreased in value. It also requires the regulator to remove a modified or restructured commercial loan from nonaccrual status if the borrower demonstrates that it can regularly repay the loan.
Marquis added that this provision may “create bright lines that may permit financial institutions to ignore other available information about the borrower that should be properly factored into evaluations of a commercial loan's collectability. There is a risk that some institutions may game the system by structuring loans in a way to make it more difficult to properly provision for losses.''
He also said that his agency has a strong appeals process and plans to issue a revamped manual for its examiners later this year.
The hearing was held by the House Financial Services Committee's Subcommittee on Financial Institutions and Consumer Credit. The panel's chairman, Rep. Shelley Moore Capito (R-W.Va.) and ranking Democrat Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.) are the lead sponsors of the measure.
Under the bill, a financial institution that is unhappy with the results of its examination would have the right to appeal it to an administrative law judge who would submit his or her findings to the ombudsman of the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC), which is made up of representatives of federal and state regulatory entities. NCUA Chairman Debbie Matz is the council's current chairman.
Representatives of CUNA and NAFCU testified in favor of the bill at the hearing.
Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to CUTimes.com, part of your ALM digital membership.
Your access to unlimited CUTimes.com content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking credit union news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Weekly Shared Accounts podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical coverage of the commercial real estate and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, GlobeSt.com and ThinkAdvisor.com
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
