Creating the Consumer Financial Protection Agency is bad policy; carving out for smaller institutions is even worse. The CFPA, as noted by numerous (and I might add Republican) members of Congress at NAFCU's Congressional Caucus, would separate consumer protections from safety and soundness. This is exactly what led to the demise of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
Consumer protections are crucial. No one wants their dear old grandmother getting taken to the cleaners with some unscrupulous reverse mortgage. At the same time, for the good of all, consumer protections cannot take away from safety and soundness, or there won't be any financial institutions to protect consumers from.
As of press time, credit union trades were following debate in the House Financial Services Committee on the CFPA. Two members of Congress introduced an amendment to the bill to exempt credit unions with less than $1.5 billion in assets and banks with less than $10 million from the purview of the CFPA. This is very bad.
Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to CUTimes.com, part of your ALM digital membership.
Your access to unlimited CUTimes.com content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking credit union news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Weekly Shared Accounts podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical coverage of the commercial real estate and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, GlobeSt.com and ThinkAdvisor.com
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.