WASHINGTON — The burden of lowering the Currency Transaction Reporting threshold from the current $3,000 level far outweighs any law enforcement benefits and could actually hamper investigations with information overload, two national credit union trade associations wrote last week in individual comment letters to the Federal Reserve.
"Although reducing or eliminating the $3,000 threshold may not substantially impact the price and types of funds transfer services that are offered, credit unions are currently struggling under the burden of complying with the ever increasing requirements posed by the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) and anti-money laundering (AML) rules, and reducing or eliminating the current $3,000 threshold will further increase this burden," CUNA Senior Assistant General Counsel Jeff Bloch wrote. "We believe law enforcement already has a wealth of information with regard to wire funds transfers. Before new burdens are imposed, credit unions want to be assured that the current information is being reviewed and analyzed to the extent possible and that any new requirements will prove useful to law enforcement, while minimizing the additional burdens on credit unions and others in the financial services industry." To illustrate the point, CUNA said a quick sampling of credit unions determined that approximately half of wire transfers at some credit unions are under $3,000.
This significant increase in the volume of data reported would not necessarily be a positive, NAFCU pointed out in its comment letter. According to NAFCU President and CEO Fred Becker, "This increase in data volume could potentially negate any law enforcement benefits that might be derived from a lower threshold. More is not necessarily better. Indeed, the tremendous growth in defensive [suspicious activity report] filings over the last few years has demonstrated that a problematic 'needle in a haystack' effect may result from expanded reporting requirements."
Recommended For You
However, Becker added, reducing the threshold would not necessarily change the related products credit unions offer or pricing. "Amending the threshold requirement would, however, impact credit unions' payment operation costs and efficiencies. Lowering or removing the threshold would increase the cost per transaction because of the additional time that would be needed to collect the required information for each funds transfer," he wrote.
NAFCU expressed concern that reducing or eliminating the threshold would lead to establishing an ongoing funds transfer requirement or lower thresholds for SARs as well.
CUNA also opposed a proposal from the Federal Reserve and the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network to change the cross-border funds transfer compliance requirements. Though there would not be much impact on the credit unions offering the service, CUNA opposed a reporting requirement specifically for cross-border funds transfers, particularly in "real-time."
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.