<p>The April 13 article “CUNA Study Shows Credit Unions Charge More On NSF Fees,” based on information from CUNA’s 2002 Fees Survey Report, draws conclusions that ignore the bulk of the survey’s findings and paints a misleading picture regarding overall credit union NSF fees. The information related to the two “Deposit Item Returned (DIR)” types of “Nonsufficient Funds (NSF)” fees cited in the text of the story is accurate. Credit unions do on average charge more for these two NSF types than do banks. However, the article significantly downplays-or worse overlooks-the more pertinent facts that credit unions are less likely than banks to charge fees for the more conventional, and far more frequently encountered, NSF fee circumstance – the one in which a member bounces a check written off of their credit union account – and that credit unions’ fees, if they are charged, fall well below those assessed by banks for this NSF type. Moreover, the most important finding of the study- which financial institutions are more consumer-friendly from the standpoint of fees-clearly is that credit unions are far more likely to offer free checking accounts than are banks. In short, reporting the comparatively insignificant findings on DIRs first and making them the focal point for the article, then implying in the opening paragraph that credit unions are not “a better deal than banks,” is simply not the case and a misrepresentation of credit unions’ overall competitive position with respect to fees. In fact, for all 12 of the instances in which credit union vs. bank comparisons are available in the survey – save for the two cited in the article- credit unions are less likely to charge a fee than are banks and charge lower fees if they do assess them. This applies to fees for the aforementioned conventional NSFs, along with those for stop payments, and overdrafts, as well as those for non-interest bearing, interest bearing and business checking accounts, and ATMs. I view the attention given to the DIR NSF’s as tantamount to “making a mountain out of a mole hill.” Vicki Joyal Vice President of Market Research & Information CUNA & Affiliates (Editor’s Note: Credit Union Times stands by the accuracy of the story. It’s widely known that credit unions are a better deal than banks on most fees, thus one news angle of this particular study was that with these types of NSF fees, credit unions charge more than banks and thrifts.)</p>

Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to CUTimes.com, part of your ALM digital membership.

Your access to unlimited CUTimes.com content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:

  • Critical CUTimes.com information including comprehensive product and service provider listings via the Marketplace Directory, CU Careers, resources from industry leaders, webcasts, and breaking news, analysis and more with our informative Newsletters.
  • Exclusive discounts on ALM and CU Times events.
  • Access to other award-winning ALM websites including Law.com and GlobeSt.com.

Already have an account?


NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Credit Union Times

Join Credit Union Times

Don’t miss crucial strategic and tactical information necessary to run your institution and better serve your members. Join Credit Union Times now!

  • Free unlimited access to Credit Union Times' trusted and independent team of experts for extensive industry news, conference coverage, people features, statistical analysis, and regulation and technology updates.
  • Exclusive discounts on ALM and Credit Union Times events.
  • Access to other award-winning ALM websites including TreasuryandRisk.com and Law.com.

Already have an account? Sign In Now
Join Credit Union Times

Copyright © 2024 ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.